When you have a baby with a genetic disorder, they send you to see a geneticist.
Image via Gage Skidmore. Note that I do not know whether Shapiro even knows of this article, nor will I reach out to him. I expected, therefore, to see a little give-and-take, some dumb, bait-y questions, but also a few good ones, too, that he was perhaps not used to.
Well, I was wrong, to put it mildly. Not exactly the hallmark of a probing and far-ranging mind. In the end, however, principles are nothing without some bedrock of reality, a thing Shapiro desperately needs a dose of after years of arguing with liberal caricatures on TV and brain-dead college campuses.
But whereas the Left is often either absurdly reductive or needlessly complicated on any given issue, Shapiro prefers both, limiting the world to sound-bites even as he throws in pointless variables that ultimately confuse even Shapiro.
Now, there is lots to get through, so let us start where my curiosity first began: The top-rated question — which Ben Shapiro no doubt saw — was this: You voiced your displeasure in the past at how it is unethical to force pro-lifers to fund Planned Parenthood through tax dollars.
Do you also think it is unethical to force certain people to fund the subsidies of meat and dairy products if they do not believe those products are ethical? Thanks Good question, but with a poor follow-up that unnecessarily gives Shapiro a way out of the logical conundrum.
If it is in fact unethical to force someone to dole out tax money for something he does not believe in, then it stands to reason that other protected classes must exist, as well.
Now, it is quite possible that Shapiro might demarcate abortion from all other exceptions, but why — when the standard is mere personal revulsion — stop at abortion?
There are countless other logical categories, from pacifists funding war, to Jainists chipping in for road-cleaning, where the offended party might feel just as strongly against some item of the Social Contract that the rest of us must consent to.
More, note how abortion is utterly divorced in this case from the global libertarian scope. Shapiro is not even making a libertarian argument against abortion — for there is no such thing, as I will later show — but appealing to an individual tax code by way of a local ethic damning that and only that tax.
Not that it matters, however. From the libertarian perspective, they are arguing for a system that — for good reason — has NEVER been implemented in its pure form. More pointedly, however, libertarianism suffers from the same endless purity-testing that its hated mirror image — stateless communism — undergoes, with every iteration of Stalin, Lenin, the Paris Commune, etc.
Yet, again, Ben is silent on a tough query, forcing me to dig up other materials where he makes his position clear: The wealthy in this country are by and large the job creators. Tax them, and they will cut jobs because it impedes their ability to create.
A flat tax is the best balance between equity and efficiency. If someone has a smaller pie, a smaller piece will be taken out of the pie. A controversial point of view, as far as the research goes, yet look at how confident Shapiro is at his own pronouncements.
To be sure, there has been exactly ZERO evidence that taxation is anything more than 1 a collective means of ensuring social goods that an individual cannot guarantee; 2 equity. Business, innovation, and recession have existed in pretty much every mature tax climatewith study after study indicating not only the problem of getting an academic consensus on whether tax cuts promote growth, but also how wildly divergent their conclusions have in fact been.
This is an honest reflection of the ONLY data that we have available. But let us assume that Shapiro is correct.
Let us assume that low tax rates do in fact promote growth and employment. Real wages have declined alongside four decades of massive tax cuts, even as worker productivity has risen quite a bit. More, the suckers just need to work. Yet Americans have worked, at more hours for less pay and less stabilitynetting corporations trillions since the s and getting little in return.
This brings us to the issue of a minimum wage, as well as the recent effort to increase it. A minimum wage requirement always impacts an economy horrifically. If the price is raised on gasoline, people tend to buy less gasoline, if the price is raised on cereal, less cereal will be sold and if the price of labor is raised, people tend to buy less labor.
First, the entire reason why there even HAD to be a minimum wage debate is because wages did not appropriately grow despite increased work hours, greater worker productivity, and exponential growth in corporate profit: The real question is whether the benefits outweigh the losses, and in the case of a carefully-implemented minimum wage hike the evidence is clear.
Like many similar organizations, the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute argues — without citations — that the biggest effect of an increase is massive job loss for affected industries.More Essay Examples on.
Abortion! - Abortion Not In My Criminal Code Essay introduction!
Not in my Condemnable Code. Abortion should be kept out of the Criminal Code. Abortion, expiration of gestation before the foetus is capable of independent life. The "All Liberians Are Related" Metality: Will President Weah Go After His Relatives? By Abdoulaye W. Dukulé Many scoffed when President George Weah said that corruption could not be fought in Liberia because everybody is related.
source url: ashio-midori.com A History of the New World Order. by [email protected] - Mayer Amschel. Jul 31, · An Online Tagalog - English Dictionary Learn Tagalog or Filipino Language for free. The black death was a necessity to prevent overpopulation and economic decline.
The economy of the fourteenth century was in a state of decline. Essay Death & its Impact Death is the eternal end of the natural functions that define a living organism.
participation in feminist movements and the creation of the womanist movement. However.
Obamacare is being developed by leftist politicians who are determined to take over the medical care industry regardless of public opinion. It is also through our simple life processes, including sexual exuberance, excretion, respiration, and final expiration, that we feed the primal source--for example, by . Thinking Outside the Box: A Misguided Idea The truth behind the universal, but flawed, catchphrase for creativity. Posted Feb 06,
Against the Theory of ‘Dynamic Equivalence’ by Michael Marlowe Revised and expanded, January Introduction. Among Bible scholars there is a school which is always inquiring into the genres or rhetorical forms of speech represented in any given passage of the Bible, and also the social settings which are supposed to be connected with these forms.